Explanation of the face of mars3/9/2023 ![]() If this is true it might be impossible to know how it looked originally. However, based on the unusual "melted" appearance of the "face's" east side, Van Flandern concludes that the east side has been distorted severely. I conclude this because the facial detail is not symmetrical, but there appears to be a horizontal eye, a broad nose bridge and a meandering, "muzzle" type mouth, consistent with the leonine interpretation. The same for the "face." In my opinion, the strongest hypothesis regarding meaning at this point is the dual hominid/feline symbolism espoused by Hoagland. But evidence of its carved nature would probably be evident. ![]() Consider Mount Rushmore in a thousand or 10,000 years.would it be clear who or what it memorialized? Probably not. The "face" has a sufficient number of anomalous properties to tilt the evidence in favor of artificiality, regardless of what its artistic purposes are. But the question is one of artificiality, not of meaning. Hoagland at the UN in 1992 - was resounding confirmedīy the latest NASA "full face" image: April 8, 2001. Here on Earth! This duality - first proposed by like many similar archaeological examples Hoagland: A hominid/feline combination - a two-speciesĭuality. Whether by design or catastrophe, his analysis is the most compelling I've seen. Hoagland based his prediction on scanty imaging analysis from the Viking images.įurther imaging has borne out his conclusions. Similar to Mayan split faced glyphs that have been found on various archaeological digs. Lausch: In the early '90's Hoagland postulated that it was a hominid-feline hybrid. ViewZone: If this is indeed a "face" then what is it a face of exactly? See NASA contractor and engineer Lan Fleming's analysis of the latest NASA blunder here: 20system/cydonia/2001_Face/Preliminary.htm In denouncing the "face" once again, it has been shown that NASA drew errant conclusions from the MOLA data, and possibly even used the wrong data, in its haste to put an end to the "face" controversy. The MOLA data confirms prior predictions by Dr. There has been no radar imagery taken of the "face." However, Mars Orbiter Laser Altimetry (MOLA) data has been acquired. Tom Van Flandern's web site for more information on this key point. Naval Observatory Celestial Mechanics director Dr. The most significant details are a 98% symmetric base, and a plethora of "facial" features, which were predicted on the basis of prior images. Mars Global Surveyor images in 19 confirm the same details appearing in the 1976 Viking images. The "face" is clearly neither a sand dune or hill. And, there has NEVER been radar on a U.S. Hoagland: No, no data other than B&W images have been ![]() NASA/JPL/MSSS have not been entirely cooperative on this issue. Further scientific inquiry will be needed to resolve this issue. Additional images have raised more questions than they've produced answers. The Mars Global surveyor reimaged it in 1997 and again last year as a result of the FACETS litigation. Lausch: The Face was originally photographed by Viking in the 1970's. ViewZone: Since the discovery of the "face," I understood that NASA had sent another probe that took photographs and radar scans of the area and revealed it to be a large sand dune or hill, with no signficiant shape. Questions & Answers: A Case For the Face. He is the author of several books including "The Other sites which have still to be delivered by Group that entered into litigation with NASA andįorced the re-imaging of the Face at Cydonia and five He heads the independent non -profit organization theĭavid Jinks is the Founder of the Formal ActionĬommitte for Extraterrestrial Studies (FACETS), the Monuments of Mars") and a recipient of the Angstrom Planetarium director, a published author ("The Hoagland is a former Space programĬonsultant to Walter Cronkite and CBS news, a former He is notorious in the Mars anomaly resaerch community for being a BAD influence on mars researchers of either gender. He loves his Harley Davidson and pretty girls. He loves motorcycles and is involved with numerous ViewZone asks three experts to bring us up to date on this persistent claim.Įric C. The raised zone is about 4.2 km (2.6 miles) across as seen in the main image. ![]() Scientists called it an illusuon due to shadows. Inset is an image of the place from NASA's Viking 1 mission, which convinced a generation of space enthusiasts that aliens had sculpted a giant face. UPDATE: September 2006: A new view of Mars' mountainous Cydonia region, sire of the famous "Face on Mars," from the European Space Agency's Mars Express craft.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |